January 06 '01
Volume 240
USPS Disservice
Rate Increase January 7th
They've a lot of nerve, those powers that
be in
the U.S. Postal Service, upping the price of postage once again, bringing
the cost to mail a letter to 34 cents. It's only a penny, and you'd think
a guy who throws away the little coppers, rather than allow them to fray
his pants' pockets wouldn't complain about the penny increase. Yet, most
folks the age of this writer can recall when the same postage stamps were
less than a dime.
Admittedly, the price of a stamp is still a bargain, but perhaps it is not
the bargain it once was. I'm not an authority on the workings of the U.S.
Postal Service, but I can speak from observations and personal experiences
with the quasi-governmental agency. Rarely will one find shopping the local
post office a pleasant experience, but to be fair, it has been my experience
that practically all forms of shopping fall into the "unpleasant category."
When's the last time you bought a stamp from a "real person," not a machine
and didnt have to stand in line to make the purchase? If you can remember
that far back, your memory is better than most.
In the youth of my "growing up," the local post office of my hometown had
several windows to serve the varying needs of the public. One of the windows
was for customers who merely wanted to buy stamps. Nowadays, it reminds me
of the Express Lane in a grocery store or the drive-thru window of a fast
food restaurant. Of course, the Stamp Window was only opened occasionally,
and, as it seemed to me at the time, was for the convenience of postal employees
rather than a service to patrons. Such windows may still exist, but as new
post offices are constructed, the Stamp Window's disappear.
As we move deeper into the age of computers, where electronic mail (email)
replaces conventional mail (known humorously as "snail mail"), we are likely
to be subjected to ever-increasing postal rate increases, as authorities
seek to balance bulging budgets with shrinking resources. It's a situation
not entirely unlike that which faces the Mississippi legislators this year.
The computer age is not the only player to impact the postal revenue as
competitive "parcel" services such as Airborne, Fed-X, and UPS further erode
the income of the postal service. I have a feeling the U.S. Postal Service
will never go away as long as there is a United States of America, but customer
service will suffer a continual decline, as surely as postal rates will continue
to rise. I don't find either circumstance to my liking, but as surely as
Sam Walton is now powerless to shorten the lines of customers in "Wally World,"
our Uncle Sam seems helpless if not hapless in rescuing us from the Postal
Service.
Given the timing of my annual Christmas Party on Christmas Eve, it is difficult
to determine whether the holiday or the Post Office holds top honors for
restricting the expected crowd. Yet, a number of invitees informed me they
received their invitations a day or two after Christmas. The invitations
were mailed from Greenville on the eighteenth and postmarked in Grenada the
following day. Given the note of dismay expressed by the invitees, I hereby
bestow the U.S. Postal Service a Raspberry Award for dereliction of
duty.
The unwelcome postal rate increase will have little long term effect upon
this newsletter, but it falls at a time when the bitterness of a recent
experience is all to fresh.
Cold December
Let It Snow
I haven't read anything official, concerning
the
monthly weather statistics for those of us who call Pontotoc home, but I
can assert that the month of December was overall the coldest December in
this writer's memory. The month may not have established any record low
temperatures for any given day, but I am convinced the average daily temperatures
for the entire month will rank near the record.
I remember the early days of the month were frigid enough for me to enjoy
the wool cardigan sweater I got for Christmas last year. As family members
pondered what to purchase their patriarch, I began to toss out the hint,
"Think wool."
Apparently, they listened. Sister Sue, Rayanne, and Jason came through with
two sweater vests and one long-sleeved crewneck, respectively. The heat retaining
characteristic of wool is phenomenal compared to man-made materials, plus
wool allows moisture to evaporate while keeping one warm. All three sweaters
have served me well during the holidays, and much more use is anticipated
this winter.
Not only have I been warmly clothed for the holidays, but also I can state
that the few snow showers that passed this way in December aesthetically
warmed my heart. Granted, there was no snow on the ground either Christmas
Eve or Christmas Day. However, earlier in December north Mississippians were
treated to a couple of snows, as well as one on New Year's Eve.
As usual, I was in the wrong place to enjoy the most snow, but I enjoyed
what was at hand, nonetheless. The threat of snow on New Year's Eve prevented
Barbara and me from returning to Greenville to welcome in the New Year. Though
we had originally planned to return to the Delta on Sunday afternoon, as
is our habit, we considered the wintry driving conditions and early revelers
might not be the sort of combination that made for safe driving into the
early evening.
Knowing that Mississippi State would be playing in a bowl game on New Year's
Eve had me curious enough to locate the channel broadcasting the televised
game. Normally, I wouldn't be interested in seeing Mississippi State play,
unless Ole Miss was the opponent, but without any party plans, I figured
it would at least help pass the time.
I could scarcely believe the picture on the TV when I saw the two teams preparing
for kickoff on a field partially covered in snow. Shreveport, LA, site of
the Independence Bowl and host to the football teams, Mississippi State and
Texas A&M, suddenly found itself host to a snow bowl.
As football games go, it was interesting enough with two closely matched
teams playing under adverse conditions. I remember the announcers telling
the temperature was 23 degrees at kickoff with the wind chill at 10 degrees.
Had it not been for the beautiful snowfall occurring in Shreveport, I might
have found a movie on another channel and sipped some hot chocolate while
watching it. Instead, I found myself watching a bowl game in which I was
not overly biased for either team and enjoying the best snowfall I had witnessed
the entire year. Mississippi State fans will remember their win, but I will
remember the weather in which the game was played long after time fades the
score.
Flag Flap New
Design Presented
The flag commission for the state of Mississippi appointed by Gov. Ronnie
Musgrove has now recommended a new state flag to the legislature. Musgrove's
initiative in appointing the commission to find a replacement for the present
flag may prove politically unpopular should he seek re-election. Given the
publicity and controversy surrounding the Confederate Battle Flag emblem
used on the present flag, emotions have been strong. How receptive the
legislature is to changing to the newly designed flag remains to be seen.
Already a petition is being circulated calling for the issue to be settled
by ballot, and the legislature is looking at a possible referendum.
Former governor, William Winter, considered by many as a levelheaded, moderate
politician served as chairman of the commission. The commission held hearings
in several sections of the state, hoping to gather citizen response and input.
In citing the need to change the design of the flag, the former governor
claimed the responses at the meetings clearly demonstrated the controversial
nature of the current state flag, and he leveraged the public outcry as being
the reason why Mississippi should adopt a new flag.
It is by no means a direct quote, but Winter's conclusion is summarized,
"The present flag is clearly a divisive symbol. What we propose is a flag
that symbolizes our unity."
I cannot completely endorse his opinion, even though I agree with what he
says. The portion of the Mississippi flag that contains the Confederate Battle
Flag is viewed by some as a symbol of slavery, of oppression/ suppression,
and by others as a symbol of white supremacy. I accept that as factual. I
even agree that it would be good to have a flag that symbolizes our unity,
provided Mississippians were a united people. It is my contention that no
flag can adequately symbolize a united people of Mississippi. The plain facts
are that Mississippi consists of a divided people. Yet, for the most part,
we are divided because it is our choice, rather than our lot in life.
Granted a few divisions are beyond our control such as gender and race, and
ethnically speaking, Mississippians are divided along color lines, with a
mixture of Whites, Blacks, Indians, Asian, and Hispanic peoples. Mississippians
are divided along ideological lines, most notably as conservative, liberal,
and moderate, while political party affiliations include Democrats, Republicans,
Libertarians, and others. Mississippians are divided socially between the
"haves" and the "have nots" with a goodly smattering of those with less than
the "haves" but more than the "have nots."
Mississippians are divided religiously. Though most are Christians, there
are Jews and people of other faiths in our state. Mississippians are divided
along educational lines, also, with educated and uneducated, literate and
illiterate, and some have "some schooling," but less than a high school diploma
while others have doctoral degrees.
Mississippians are further divided as to their allegiances to colleges and
universities, and to a favorite ethnic food. We are divided over the abortion
issue, the gambling issue, and the alcohol issue. Let's face it, Mississippians
have their differences, not only with the rest of the country, but with each
other.
Wherein then has divisive become a four-letter word or a word we should assign
a hyphenated status, perhaps calling it the d-word? Is it now politically
incorrect to be different?
Personally, I like the fact we're are all different, and I fare better with
others who are willing to accept me for my differences than those who seek
to make me like themselves. The whole concept of division and unity is being
exploited by the politically powerful to advance their particular agenda,
and it is unfortunate that many will be deceived in the process.
As recently as Christmas Eve, a group of churches in the Tupelo area called
upon all citizens to support the adoption of the newly designed state flag.
It is the belief of the group that the Confederate Battle Flag is no more
than a symbol of racism and hatred. Their statement parallels that of others
who claim the battle flag has been defiled by certain hate groups and is
therefore an unfit symbol to be represented on the Mississippi State Flag.
Strangely, the church group and others who adopt this particular point of
view do not feel compelled to remove the Christian Cross from steeples and
sanctuaries throughout Mississippi. However, the symbolism of the Cross has
been tarnished by members of the Ku Klux Klan, who once burned crosses to
intimidate blacks and keep them "in their place." Thus "what's good for the
goose," is only valid for the "gander" when it serves a particular whim.
Being a Mississippian is an ideological concept, more than a geographically
defined status. I'll still be proud to be a Mississippian whenever the flag
controversy is dead and buried, assuming I out live it. If a new flag for
the state of Mississippi is in order, perhaps it would be better to have
one that addresses our divisiveness rather than our unity.
The newly proposed flag bears a strong resemblance to one of the flags of
the Confederacy shown here. The same design is employed but with some slight
modifications. The newly proposed flag has several stars in concentric circles,
on a field of red, and the bars at the top and bottom are blue rather than
red.
Once the similarity is widely noted, those who oppose the battle flag will
likely oppose the new design, too. Rather than accepting a design of a few
bars and several stars, why not create a patchwork quilt designed to express
our differences? To be fair to all, the flag should include Confederate President
Jefferson Davis' vignette alongside that of civil rights' activist, Martin
L. King, Jr. We shall also want to include those symbols of our major
Universities, religions, and political persuasions. That's just a start,
as divisiveness is rather an extensive subject.
Meanwhile, I remain unconvinced of the need to change our state flag to a
less divisive, more unifying emblem, and call upon supporters of a flag change
to embrace the fact we are different. Learn to live with it; it'll be a good
lesson in tolerance for everyone.
Correction
A Christmas Story
It was reported in the December 23rd issue of RRN that this writer's
family had not purchased a video of A Christmas Story. While that
may well be the truth, we feel obligated to acknowledge that a store-bought
copy of this Christmas Classic was found among the small collection of videos
in our Pontotoc home. This writer is mostly human and is therefore subject
to the same memory errors that plague all of us who try maintaining inventories
of important stuff in separate residences.
Thus did the Carter family of Dogwood Circle, enjoy another viewing of the
movie and watched intently once again as Ralphie almost shot his eye out
with his new Red Ryder BB gun.
Bodock Beau
Animal Instincts
Happy New Year, and for you purists a Happy New Millennium! Some folks didn't
consider the beginning of 2000, the start of the third millennium because
there was no year zero established by the Julian Calendar. Because the Romans
did not use zero, the year 2000 arrived 1,999 years after year 1, instead
of 2,000 years after year zero. Thus, picky people chose to celebrate this
past New Years as the official beginning of the current millennium.
The following humor was borrowed from the Internet.
Once upon a time, a fundamentalist Christian couple felt it important to
own an equally fundamentally Christian pet, so they went shopping.
At a kennel specializing in this particular breed, they found a dog they
liked quite a lot. When they asked the dog to fetch the Bible, he did it
in a flash. When they instructed him to look up Psalm 23, he complied equally
fast, using his paws with dexterity. They were impressed, purchased the animal,
and went home.
That night they had friends over. They were so proud of their new fundamentalist
dog and his major skills, they called in the dog and showed off a little.
The friends were impressed and asked whether the dog was able to do any of
the usual dog tricks as well. This stopped the couple cold, as they hadn't
thought about "normal" tricks.
Well, they said. "Let's try this out."
Once more they called the dog, and they clearly pronounced the command, "Heel!"
Quick as a wink, the dog jumped up, put his paw on the man's forehead, closed
his eyes in concentration, and bowed his head.
--------------------------------
An out-of-towner drove his car into a ditch in a desolated area. Luckily,
a local farmer came to help with his big strong horse named Buddy.
He hitched Buddy up to the car and yelled, "Pull, Nellie, pull!" Buddy didn't
move. Then the farmer hollered, "Pull, Buster, pull!" Buddy didn't respond.
Once more the farmer commanded, "Pull, Coco, pull!"
Nothing. Then the farmer nonchalantly said, "Pull, Buddy, pull!" And the
horse easily dragged the car out of the ditch.
The motorist was most appreciative and very curious. He asked the farmer
why he called his horse by the wrong name three times.
The farmer said, "Oh, Buddy is blind, and if he thought he was the only one
pulling, he wouldn't even try!"
Home
Copyright © 1998-2000 RRN
Online.